Featured

CPG: Canada Must Say No to ‘Golden Dome’ Strategic Missile Defence — A Call for Parliamentary Oversight

Canadian Pugwash Letter

Ahmed Hussen, Chair
Standing Committee on National Defence

Charles Sousa, Chair
Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development
House of Commons

Dear Chairs,

On behalf of the Canadian Pugwash Group, I am writing to express our grave concern about the Government of Canada’s movement toward participation in the United States’ proposed strategic ballistic missile defence initiatives within “Golden Dome”.

Recent reports suggest that the government is considering removing long-standing restrictions on strategic missile defence, paving the way for Canadian direct involvement in those elements of Golden Dome or similar schemes. Negotiations are reportedly already under way.

This situation raises profound questions of accountability and oversight. To date, there has been no parliamentary debate, committee review, or public consultation on whether Canada should commit tens of billions of dollars to what would be one of the most expensive and controversial military programmes ever launched. Decisions of this magnitude cannot be allowed to proceed with so little attention or accountability.

Read full letter here: CPG_Letter_GoldenDome_ParliamentaryOversight_Sept2025

Douglas Roche: Carney went to the UN to advance Canada’s foreign policy, Trump went to abuse, harangue the UN in a tirade of false accusations

The author is a member and past Chair of Canadian Pugwash Group
Published in The Hill Times, September 29, 2025

Mark Carney’s four days at the UN showed his belief that Donald Trump’s aggressiveness can be fought off by strengthening Canada’s trade, energy, and security through diplomacy. When Carney returned home and went to Question Period, the opposition seemed uninterested in grilling him on what he had accomplished at the UN. 

EDMONTON—The contrast could not have been sharper. Prime Minister Mark Carney went to the United Nations in New York from Sept. 21-24, and used the organization’s convening power to advance Canada’s foreign policy interests. United States President Donald Trump went to the UN for a few hours and abused the organization in a tirade of false accusations. These two story lines intersected, and Carney emerged as a new leader in the international community.

All this has to be seen in perspective. Of course, the U.S. is the giant whose every twitch grabs the headlines. When the escalator to the General Assembly broke down on Trump and his wife, CNN led with this malfunction as a metaphor about how the UN can’t get anything done. When Carney co-chaired a meeting with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the plight of the Ukrainian children stolen by Russia, this humanitarian action was treated as just a side event.

For nearly an hour, Trump stood at the green podium in the General Assembly belittling and berating the UN for its immigration and climate policies. He mocked the UN for not choosing him as the developer when the headquarters was renovated decades ago, and treated the delegates as merely an extension of his usual MAGA audience. Carney dutifully showed up at the Canadian desk to listen to Trump’s harangue and later, at his own press conference, tried to smooth over Trump’s viciousness by saying he supported the president’s efforts to bring peace to the world. Carney, who is in the midst of Canada-U.S. trade negotiations, seems very conscious of Trump’s warning, “I only do business with the people I like,” and later took his wife Diana Fox Carney to Trump’s reception for the delegates.

Carney’s principal address affirmed Canada’s formal recognition of the State of Palestine, reinforcing this country’s support for a two-state solution to build peace between Israel and Palestine. The prime minister called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of the Israeli hostages still held by Hamas, and the rapid scale-up of humanitarian relief in Gaza. Recognizing Palestine was certainly a late action by Canada, since more than 150 countries had already done so, but in the company of the United Kingdom and France in this UN setting, Carney felt comfortable moving ahead, despite Trump’s veiled threats he would punish Canada in the trade talks for such action. Only a few days previously, the U.S. had vetoed—again—a Security Council resolution demanding an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in the Gaza Strip.

Carney’s shining moment at the UN was his co-chairing, along with Zelenskyy, a meeting of 42 states to build pressure for the return of more than 20,000 Ukrainian children abducted by Russia. Accompanied by his wife, Carney called for more international support for the International Coalition for the Return of Ukrainian Children. The meeting laid plans to embed the return of the children within broader efforts for peace, reconciliation and accountability in Ukraine.

Carney then turned his attention to a meeting of specialists on the technicalities of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, which has become an agonizing issue for the UN because the money that should be going to development processes in the most vulnerable states is being siphoned off by the escalating arms expenditures. The world now spends $2.7-trillion annually on arms, an amount which is 750 times greater than what nations devote to the UN. In his capacity as current chair of the G7, Carney tried to shore up the mechanisms to boost human development.

Here, Carney is doing high-wire diplomacy. He has acceded to Trump’s demand that NATO states devote five per cent of their GDP to defence spending, which, in Canada’s case, will mean a quadrupling of defence spending over the next decade. This will amount to $150-billion a year. Even if a good slice of this will be in the form of strengthening infrastructure here at home, defence spending will continue to dwarf what is spent on diplomatic efforts to build peace.

Yet it was diplomacy that Carney concentrated on during his four-day New York stay. He seemed moved by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’ cry, “We have entered into an age of reckless disruption and relentless human suffering,” and leaders must decide now “what kind of world we choose to build together.” He met privately with Guterres and, according to Carney’s press statement, discussed Canada’s commitment to a “strong and effective” UN. Canada currently contributes $2.2-billion to the UN annually, and is the organization’s seventh-largest donor. He announced $207-million in new international assistance to improve global children’s nutrition and to address climate change.

The current UN financial crisis is caused by the U.S. defaulting on $1-billion in payments, and the Trump administration’s plans for a $1-billion cut in future assessments. This has already caused Guterres to lay off 15 per cent of UN staff. Trump, in his tirade against the UN, said not a word about America cutting back its payments.

China is stepping up its involvement in the UN administration and outreach. It was notable that Carney had a private meeting with the Premier of China, Li Qiang, to discuss canola, seafood and electric vehicles. This meeting laid the groundwork for a possible summit between Carney and China’s president Xi Jinping. If such a meeting were to occur, it would confirm Canada’s swing to renewed cooperation with the world’s second-largest economy, a move clearly designed to offset Canada’s economic dependence on the U.S.

Carney also met with the leaders of Namibia, Kenya, Barbados, Jamaica, Haiti and Malaysia in a burst of meetings that strengthened this country’s network of UN relationships. His four days at the UN showed his strong belief that Trump’s aggressiveness can be fought off by strengthening Canada’s trade, energy, and security through building networks of action with the UN at the core.

That is a message that desperately needs to be broadcast across the country, but I’m not sure it has been heard. When Carney went straight to Question Period in the House of Commons on his arrival back from New York, the opposition seemed not the least interested in grilling the prime minister on what he had accomplished at the UN.

Senator Douglas Roche’s latest book is Keep Hope Alive: Essays for a War-free World (Amazon).

The Hill Times

 

Douglas Roche, O.C. Named 2025 Winner of CLND Award for Distinguished Achievement in Nuclear Disarmament

 

Douglas Roche, O.C. Named 2025 Winner of CLND Award for
Distinguished Achievement in Nuclear Disarmament:

Presentation and Lecture in Ottawa on October 23, 202

July 17, 2025

Douglas Roche, O.C. will receive the Canadian Leadership for Nuclear Disarmament (CLND) 2025 Distinguished Achievement Award. He has devoted himself over many decades to the vital cause of nuclear disarmament and, ultimately, the global abolition of nuclear weapons. CLND is a civil society initiative sponsored by the Canadian Pugwash Group. It is endorsed by more than 1,000 recipients of the Order of Canada who have called for Canada to work for comprehensive negotiations for the elimination of nuclear weapons.

“We are immensely proud to give this year’s Award to Douglas Roche, honouring his unwavering and inspiring leadership, for more than 50 years, resolutely focused on ridding the world of its catastrophically deadly arsenal of nuclear weapons,” said Alex Neve O.C., CLND Chairperson. “There is no one who has been so steadfast, brought so many others to this vital campaign, and shown all Canadians the moral clarity and pragmatic necessity of the cause. Doug Roche embodies the very epitome of the essence and finest qualities of leadership. And he has ardently and eloquently shown us all just what is at stake: our very survival.”

Douglas Roche has had the rare distinction of serving in the three roles of a Canadian Member of Parliament, Ambassador for Disarmament and Senator. He received appointments from two prime ministers of different parties: Brian Mulroney appointed him ambassador and Jean Chretien named him a senator. In all of those roles he has been a clarion voice for peace, justice and human rights, and has been untiring in his determined effort, in particular, to advance nuclear disarmament.

Roche, who is also a former Visiting Professor at the University of Alberta, has been a lifelong educator, informing Canadians of the risks posed by nuclear weapons and policy options to lessen those risks. He has written 25 books, and multiple articles and speeches. To strengthen disarmament education, he has organized many Parliamentary breakfasts, civil society meetings, roundtables, seminars, and briefings. He holds nine honorary doctorates and is an Officer of the Order of Canada.

Roche has also been integral to the creation of a wide range of effective nuclear disarmament advocacy groups. He was founding Chairperson of  Parliamentarians for Global Action, the Middle Powers Initiative, and the Canadian Network to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. He was the first international president of Parliamentarians for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament.

“For his integrity, knowledge, dedication and unflagging hard work, Douglas Roche commands an exceptional – in fact unrivalled – level and degree of respect across Canada and globally, including from governments, UN officials, civil society leaders, academics, and peace and human rights activists,” said Neve. “At the age of 96, the determination and energy he continues to bring to this crucial campaign, sets a model that we all must aspire to follow.”

The Award will be presented at 4 PM on Thursday, October 23, 2025 and followed by Douglas Roche’s lecture, on “Creative Dissent: A Politician’s Struggle for Peace.” This public event is sponsored by CLND and the Centre for International Policy Studies (CIPS) at the University of Ottawa, in Room 4007 of the Faculty of Social Sciences Building, 120 University Private, Ottawa. The lecture will be followed by a reception and will conclude at 6 pm.

 

Previous recipients of the CNWC/CLND Achievement Award are:

2011 Murray Thomson

2012 Bev Tollefson Delong

2013 Fergus Watt

2014 Dr. Adele Buckley

2015 Paul Dewar

2016 Peggy Mason

2017 Metta Spencer

2018 Debbie Grisdale

2019 Dr. Mary-Wynne Ashford and Dr. Jonathan Down

2021 Dr. Jennifer Allen Simons

2022 Paul Meyer

2023 Tariq Rauf

2024 Ernie Regehr

 

Contact:    Elaine Hynes

CLND Secretariat

clnd@pugwashgroup.ca

Recent publications by Canadian Pugwash members

David Harries (co-speaker): AI and OUR Future – Safety and Security: The Promise, Peril, and the Public Good” KEI Network, Sept. 11, 2025

Jez Littlewood (co-author): “How new technology could make it easier to identify covert bioweapons programs” Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, Sept. 15, 2025

Cesar Jaramillo: “The Deterrence Ceiling: Ukraine’s Postwar Security Under Russia’s Nuclear Shadow“, Sane Policy Institute, Sept, 13, 2025

Ernie Regehr: “When Winning Isn’t An Option” Arctic Security Briefing Paper, The Simons Foundation Canada, Sept 9, 2025

Jeremy Whitock: “For 80 years, Canada has been a leader in the responsible development of nuclear energy“, Hill Times, August 11, 2025, [WhitlockHT]

Earl Turcotte: “As world marks 80 years since atomic anniversary, Canada has room to lead” The Hill Times, August 6, 2025

Robin Collins, Gordon Edwards, Jeremy Whitlock: Three letters on radiation issues The Hill Times, August 4, 2025

Sean Howard:‘Other, more benevolent things’: Revisiting Helsinki to prevent the final act of nuclear war”  Rethinking Securitiy, July 30, 2025.

Jeremy Whitlock: Remember, enriched uranium can do good” The Hill Times, Letter, July 21, 2025 [WhitlockHT]

Douglas Roche: Bob Rae is Feeling the UN’s Pain” The Hill TImes, July 16, 2025 [RocheHT]

Robin Collins:The Debate about Gaza’s Death Count and Human Shields” Rideau Institute, July 15, 2025.

Cesar Jaramillo: “NATO Goes MAGA” Sane Policy Institute, July 8, 2025.

Michael Manulak, broadcast: “Reflections on Canada and the Global Order” BrianCrombie.com, July 7, 2025

Sean Howard:Manifesting our humanity: Remembering how to survive in the nuclear age” The Cape Breton Post, July 4, 2025.

Paul Meyer: The Future of Iran’s Nuclear Program: Could Withdrawal from the NPT be Next?” Policy, July 5, 2025.

Robin Collins:Canada – and the world – need prudent not excessive military spending” Ceasefire Blog, July 2, 2025.

Cesar Jaramillo:Flawed in principle and practice: why Canada must say no to Trump’s Golden Dome” The Hill Times, June 30, 2025.

Douglas Roche: “The real Mark Carney is about to emerge” The Hill Times, June 30, 2025.

Erika Simpson and Gordon Edwards: “Iran’s uranium enrichment: myths, realities, and what Canada should understand” The Hill Times, June 30, 2025.

Michael Manulak, participant: “Canada’s foreign policy must catch up to its military spending” Globe and Mail, June 27, 2025.

Paul Meyer:Canada Shouldn’t Buy into the Mirage of “Golden Dome” CIPS, June 25, 2025.

Erika Simpson: “NATO’s dangerous new trajectory of expensive targets” The Hill Times, June 25, 2025.

Peter Jones:Will Iran be Donald Trump’s Forever War?” Policy, June 22, 2025.

Peggy Mason, participant: “Canada and Gaza: What are the Moral and Legal Obligations?” OFIP, June 16, 2025.

Erika Simpson and Hwang, J.: “Forging Peace in 2025-2030: The Role of Canada and South Korea as Middle Powers in Leading Global Conflict Resolution“. In Factis Pax: Journal of Peace Education and Social Justice19(1). June 16, 2025.

Jeremy Whitlock:Non-proliferation and the Nuclear Revival” 49th Annual CNS/CNA Student Conference, Toronto, June 8-11, 2025.

 

Published views by members of CPG are not necessarily those of our organization.

Meyer: Canada Shouldn’t Buy into the Mirage of “Golden Dome”

Paul Meyer is a Board member and Past Chair of Canadian Pugwash Group

https://www.cips-cepi.ca/2025/06/25/canada-shouldnt-buy-into-the-mirage-of-golden-dome/

A new Canadian Government is assuming power at a time of great upheaval in international affairs. Norms of non-aggression, cooperative security and strategic restraint are being undermined. Regrettably, some of this disruption originates with our American ally with whom, as the Prime Minister has said, we will need to forge a new security relationship. 

Whitlock: NON-PROLIFERATION AND THE NUCLEAR REVIVAL

Jeremy Whitlock is a member of Canadian Pugwash Group

IAEA Dept. of Safeguards (ret’d)
Principal: Ottertail Consulting Inc. Stratford, ON

Paper delivered to 44th Annual CNS Conference and the 49th Annual CNS/CNA Student Conference
Westin Harbour Castle Hotel, Toronto, ON, Canada, June 8-11, 2025

FULL PAPER LINKED HERE: Non-proliferation and the Nuclear Revival – Jeremy Whitlock – CNS2025

The summary:

The nuclear revival will need to proceed in lock step with enhancements to the non-proliferation regime if it is to succeed while remaining consistent with international legal obligations. In the past the evolution of the nuclear industry has proceeded at a slow enough pace that nuclear safeguards – the cornerstone of non-proliferation and therefore of civilian nuclear energy expansion – has generally been able to keep up with emerging implementation challenges. The safeguards challenges of the current nuclear revival however, based on the diversity of technologies and timeliness of proposed deployment, will be both significant and quickly evolving. There is a clear need, therefore, for early engagement so that safeguards solutions can be integrated within the design process and considered alongside safety and security requirements.

The good news is that, given sufficient early engagement, safeguards solutions exist and non-proliferation does not have to be an impediment to nuclear innovation (or put another way, nuclear innovation an impediment to global security). Quite the contrary, as embodied in the tenets of the NPT, non-proliferation can rightfully assume its role as an enabler and cornerstone of nuclear innovation: the NPT, it must be remembered, recognizes the “inalienable right” of nations to benefit from peaceful nuclear technology.

For Canada this will possibly include a national debate over technologies such as reprocessing – a technology that it pioneered in the earliest years of its nuclear program but has generally avoided until very recently. For innovations such as this, there are clearly proliferation challenges but also non-proliferation solutions (largely in the form of adequate safeguards).

Safeguards by Design, the proactive practice of good engineering whereby an end user’s international obligations are accounted for as early as possible, is also a concept pioneered by Canada. By continuing to accord due weight to this requirement, Canada is in a position to honour its legacy of leadership in global non-proliferation, and help ensure a sustainable nuclear revival.

 

EN / FR