CNWC Award Lecture by Tariq Rauf: Ending the Perpetual Menace of Nuclear Weapons

“Following the Trinity nuclear test detonation of 16 th July 1945, nuclear scientist Leó Szilárd observed that, “Almost without exception, all the creative physicists had misgivings about the use of the bomb” and further that “Truman did not understand at all what was involved regarding nuclear weapons”. These days, the movie Oppenheimer has been the rage based on a noteworthy biography of Robert Oppenheimer entitled American Prometheus written by historians Kai Bird and Martin Sherwin. Though the movie spares its viewers the horrors of the atomic bombing of Japan, it does reflect the warnings of the early nuclear weapon scientists about the long-term or permanent dangers of a nuclear arms race and associated risks of further nuclear weapons use. On the other hand, the film overlooks other historical works including A World Destroyed: Hiroshima and its Legacies also by Martin Sherwin, that disputes and negates the US government’s narrative about the necessity of using nuclear weapons twice over civilian targets in Japan and suggests that the decisions were driven mainly by geostrategic and prestige considerations – criteria still in operation today to justify continuing retention of nuclear weapons.”

October 23, 2023, University of Ottawa

Read on: Tariq Rauf: Ending Perpetual Menace of NW

Video of Tariq Rauf’s Presentation at CIPS

Preliminary Climate Forum Reports

These four reports were prelimiary summaries of the 25 one-hour forums, written by Metta Spencer, and submitted to the Canadian Pugwash Group climate crisis committee for assessment.

From these reports, the committee developed baseline recommendations and then produced final reports that were approved for distribution by CPG’s Board and Metta Spencer (Project Save the World).

The final committee reports are available here: FINAL CLIMATE REPORTS

 

Preliminary reports:

SPENCER_Report on Forums on Restoring Arctic Climate

SPENCER_Report on Forums on Carbon Negative Concrete

SPENCER_Report on Forums on Soil Amendments

SPENCER_Report on Forums on Urban Forestry

 

Today’s Wars No Excuse to Abandon Disarmament

(Download statement as .pdf here)

Published in The Hill Times, Novemeber 1, 2023

For the first time, the four leading organizations in Canada devoted to nuclear disarmament issues — Canadian Pugwash Group, Canadian Network to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, Canadians for a Nuclear Weapons Convention and Project Ploughshares — co-sponsored a single event on Oct. 19, 2023. This extraordinary Roundtable, “Revitalizing Nuclear Disarmament Afer the Ukraine War,” was convened at a moment of extreme danger to the world. This is the Roundtable’s abridged report to the Government of Canada.

Full Report, Canada’s Role in Nuclear Disarmament in a Multi-Polar World: After Ukraine SpecialRoundtable Report

 

Canada’s Role in Nuclear Disarmament in a Multi-Polar World (October 2023)

Report to the Government of Canada on Special Roundtable

October 23, 2023

For the first time, the four leading organizations in Canada devoted to nuclear disarmament issues — Canadian Pugwash Group, Canadian Network to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, Canadians for a Nuclear Weapons Convention and Project Ploughshares — co-sponsored a single event on October 19, 2023. This extraordinary Roundtable, “Revitalizing Nuclear Disarmament After the Ukraine War,” was convened at a moment of extreme danger to the world. This is the Roundtable report to the Government of Canada.

After Ukraine Special Roundtable_ReportwithTranslation

 

CPG Annual General Meeting and Communications Panel

Saturday October 21, 2023,
Ottawa, Cartier Place Suite Hotel
180 Cooper Street

Morning 10:15 – 12:00
Canadian Pugwash Group AGM

Lunch 12:00 – 1:00

Afternoon 1:00 PM – 1:30 PM: This is a joint event of CNANW and CPG.
Panel Discussion on the current situation, NPT and other updates.
Moderator:  Sylvie Lemieux
Speakers: Paul Myer and Tariq Rauf

1:30 — 3:30 PM: This is a joint event of CNANW and CPG.
Special Communications Event:
Why does the climate crisis have the attention of the public, media and to some extent policy makers, whereas the nuclear weapons threat does not?
This will be a Chatham House Rule event (no attribution without permission)

Moderator: Sylvie Lemieux, CNANW Co-chair, Canadian Pugwash Group member

Roundtable participants:
Daniel Barbarie, Deputy Director, Nuclear and Chemical Weapons) Non-Proliferation, Disarmament, and Space Division, Global Affairs Canada; Firdaus Kharas, Chairman and Executive Producer, Chocolate Moose Media; Paul Meyer, International Security/International Studies, Simon Fraser University, former Cdn Ambassador for Disarmament, Board Member, and past Chair, Canadian Pugwash Group; Tariq Rauf, Expert and Consultant on nuclear governance matters, based in Vienna, Vice-Chair Canadian Pugwash Group; Elizabeth Renzetti, Author, former Globe and Mail columnist (by zoom), Dr. Irena Knezevic, Media academic, Carleton University.

CPG and CIPS Event: The Security Challenges of Emerging Technologies, OCTOBER 20, 2023

EVENT REPORT can be accessed here:
The-Security-Challenges-of-Emerging-Technologies_Final-Report

The Security Challenges of Emerging Technologies

Walter Dorn: Canada is letting other nations do the heavy lifting on peacekeeping

Canada is letting other nations do the heavy lifting on peacekeeping,
published in the Globe and Mail, September 15, 2023

Walter Dorn is a Canadian Pugwash Group board member, and professor of defence studies at the Royal Military College. He is also a UN consultant and has deployed as a civilian to several peacekeeping operations.

Thirty years ago this month, Canadian forces engaged in combat with an unlikely opponent: Croatian forces violating a UN ceasefire and engaging in ethnic cleansing. The Battle of Medak Pocket included a 16-hour firefight, which was at the time Canada’s largest military battle since the Korean War. More surprising at that moment was that the Canadians were using force as part of UN peacekeeping. Up until that time, peacekeepers had almost never engaged in combat. This story of the use of force was so unusual for traditional peacekeeping that it was kept under wraps for 10 years by the Canadian government, which only started to publicly recognize the valour of the peacekeepers in December, 2002.

Fortunately, UN peacekeeping has become much more robust in the 21st century. This followed a groundbreaking Canadian-sponsored resolution on the protection of civilians at the UN Security Council in 1999, when Canada was last on the council. After that, the UN used armed force in Sierra Leone, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Central African Republic, South Sudan and in several other missions. It even deployed armed helicopters to some of the operations, saving cities, rescuing hostages and freeing citizens from gang lords.

Certainly, the use of armed force remains a dilemma for peacekeepers who seek to de-escalate conflict in war-torn areas of the world. But when civilians are about to be slaughtered or the peacekeepers themselves are under attack, force is absolutely justified. And it is essential that the UN responds effectively to save lives, alleviate more suffering and maintain its credibility.

The United Nations needs countries to provide combat-capable forces to its missions. Unfortunately, Canada is not among those nations any more. It promised a “quick reaction force” in 2017 but it has failed to deliver on that promise. In fact, Canada has only provided troops on two occasions in the past 20 years and these were brief deployments where Canadian soldiers never fired a shot for self-defence or the protection of civilians.

Over time, the Canadian Armed Forces has become much more risk-averse in UN peacekeeping. Other nations are doing the heavy lifting. The United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden and Portugal, as well as many developing countries, have shown a willingness to use force to protect civilians and enforce peace in conflict-ridden lands.

Current Canadian political leaders are not requesting the Canadian forces to deploy in peacekeeping, even though the Liberal government has promised to re-engage in UN peacekeeping in the past three elections. In fact, the number of uniformed peacekeepers deployed as a monthly average under the Liberal government is half the number deployed by the previous Conservative government.

Currently Canada deploys only 35 military personnel to peacekeeping, out of the 68,000 that the UN has in the field. At the time of the Battle of Medak Pocket, Canada had 3,300 personnel in UN operations. Since 1956, when Canada proposed the first peacekeeping force, Canada deployed 1,000 peacekeepers or more at any given time over the following 40 years. But those days are long gone.

Canada still seeks to build a rules-based international order, but it must do much more to support the centre of that order, the United Nations. Peacekeeping is one of the world organization’s key instruments in alleviating human suffering and promoting peace.

What will it take for Canada to become a prolific peacekeeper again? It will need political leadership and growing practice, with military leaders willing and eager to learn the ins and outs of the UN. Most importantly, it will require that Canada summon the courage, commitment and tenacity that the Canadian soldiers once showed in Medak Pocket.

Sean Howard: Silencing the pacifists, rather than the guns

 Sean Howard’s essay is due to appear in The Cape Breton Spectator.

 

[M]embers of the Ukrainian Security Service, the SBU, break down the door of the Kyiv apartment of Yurii Sheliazhenko, Executive Secretary of the Ukrainian Pacifist Movement, seizing his computer, smartphone, and other materials, informing him he is being charged with ‘justifying Russian aggression’.

The basis of the charge, Sheliazhenko was told, was the ‘Peace Agenda for Ukraine and the World’ adopted by the Ukrainian Pacifist Movement on September 21, 2022 – UN International Day of Peace – which indeed makes its position on Russia’s invasion clear:

Condemning Russian aggression against Ukraine, the UN General Assembly called for an immediate peaceful resolution of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and emphasized that parties to the conflict must respect human rights and international humanitarian law. We share this position.

For the complete article: 

CPG contributions to: Regional Security in the North, Nuclear Risks and Possible Solutions

Conference Proceedings from the webinar Regional Security in the North, Nuclear Risks and Possible Solutions are published on the Journal of Autonomy and Security Studies’ website, see www.jass.ax .  The full text of eight articles is available on the website, and in pdf format.

Two articles by CPG members.  

Strategic Nuclear Patrols and an Arctic Military Code of Conduct:
Ernie Regehr

Destabilization of the Arctic:
Adele Buckley

WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTS FOR NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT: CPG side event at the NPT Preparatory Committee meeting, Vienna, August 10, 2023

Tariq Rauf, Vice-Chair Canadian Pugwash Group moderated the event, with Panellist Paul Meyer, Past Chair of CPG.

WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTS FOR NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT
CPG side event at the NPT Preparatory Committee meeting, Vienna, August 10, 2023

Outline of CPG Side Event 10Aug2023

“After Ukraine – What are the prospects for nuclear disarmament?”
Presentation by Paul Meyer

“This rusting out of the machinery of arms control and disarmament has gone on largely unnoticed by politicians and publics alike. It is only with the revival of what is somewhat euphemistically referred to as “great power rivalry” and which more accurately is the unleashing of aggressive war and the acceleration of the arms race that the world is beginning to pay attention. President Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, a blatant violation of the UN Charter, that Russia as a Permanent Member of the Security Council is obliged to uphold has shaken the international community. Furthermore, Putin’s recourse to threats of nuclear weapons use, explicit or implicit, has once again highlighted the role of these weapons as instruments of coercion and intimidation.”

Read the full presentation here: AfterUkraineWhitherNucDisAug2023

The recorded presentation can be viewed: here

Meyer’s ten specific actions that would be worth pursuing:
1. Build on the common adherence to the NPT to construct bridges between the camps
supporting and opposing the TPNW, including encouraging attendance as observers
to TPNW meetings of state parties.
2. Continue to press for NPT reform that will enhance transparency and accountability
process with respect to Article VI obligations – common reporting templates and
dedicated time for discussion of national reports. The lack of an agreed outcome to
the working group that met in the week prior to the PrepCom should not deter
states from insisting on reform measures – resorting to voting on these procedural
steps if necessary.
3. Promote adoption of “No First Use” doctrines in keeping with existing commitments
within the NPT to reduce the saliency of nuclear weapons in national security
policies.
4. Amplify the declaration issued by the G20 in November 2022 to the effect that any
threat or use of nuclear weapons is “inadmissible”
5. Advocate for de-alerting and related steps which insert a fire break for nuclear use.
6. Urge states to ban all cyber operations directed against nuclear weapon complexes.
7. Press the NWS not to employ AI in the control systems for their nuclear forces in a
manner than supplants human control and responsibility.
8. Call upon the participants in the NWS/P5 process to conduct serious negotiations on
nuclear risk reduction and nuclear arms control in keeping with their NPT
obligations.
9. Support the initiation of negotiations on a Fissile Material Treaty via a UN General
Assembly authorized process as opposed to the dysfunctional CD.
10. Call for the resumption of bilateral talks between Russia and the US to conclude a
follow-up agreement to New START prior to its expiration in February 2026

EN / FR